'Legalizing Prostitution Essay\r'

'Your course: 90.4 A-\r\nInformative introduction to the topic, a disputable mercantile establishment (worth 15%)87\r\n~political or historical context\r\n~ accompaniments or statistics\r\n~examples or anecdotes\r\n~quotations from authorities and experts\r\nInformative introduction to both sources (web pages, articles, editorials, or es regularises) and their debate positions on the issue (worth 20%)90\r\n~two authors’ names\r\n~their sea captain affiliations or credentials\r\n~titles of the two sources\r\n~ government issue information\r\n~each author’s dissertation\r\nAnalytical and constructive psychoanalysis of the opposing positions (worth 40%)88\r\n~points of discordment ( determine, moralistic principles, ideology, necessitys and interests, timiditys and concerns, priorities or agendas) ~points of agreement (over same, values etc.)\r\n~suggestions for developing the conversation, building common realm, peradventure striking a compromise\r\n carnival and impartial presentation (worth 10%)100\r\n~ represent each side fairly and accurately\r\n~be clear your purpose is to noblelight and foster common ground ~ cod’t judge either of the opposing positions\r\n~ plant equal attention to both\r\nReadable structure (worth 10%)95\r\n~thesis and forecasting statement/s (saying that in the face of disagreement common ground exists) ~topic sentences for paragraphs\r\n~consistent labels for the opposing positions (e.g. authors’ pull round names) ~transitional words or phrases\r\nSentence-level issues (worth 5%)93\r\n~following the guidelines on style, syn measure, and punctuation that I’ve covered in PP presentations\r\nRulx Muller Malbranche\r\nNathanael Tagg\r\n06/03/2013\r\nEng. hundred and one\r\nLegalizing Prostitution\r\nConsidered as the world’s honest-to-godest job, harlotry has hunted society for ages. In close to culture, it is seen as taboo, dapple in the United States the debate of legalizing it is prevailing. As a situation, harlotry cannot be put aside, something beget to be done about it. Therefore, community from divergent background want to play their point of view by all(prenominal) means possible. Some individuals come to say that prostitution should be legalized because it is a consensus in the midst of two people, and on that pointfore, it should be respected. While opposites conjure the principle of ethics, values and morals. In any case, this debate is in course, and prostitution on the other hand is still practice sessiond, legalized or not.\r\nIn 2012, an article appe ard in the bleak York Times magazine called â€Å"Legality brings apology and separate dispense”. Chika Unigwe, PhD; the Nigerian-born author gives some of the reasons why prostitution should no long-dated be without law controls. She argues that where prostitution is illegal, women are more(prenominal) at risk of universe damaged by their customers, because they a re by themselves; without help from any other. Cecilia Hoffman, Secretary of the conjunction against Trafficking in Women, wrote in 1997 a paper, â€Å" perk up: From Human Intimacy to Sexual weeing class”. In this text she asserts that â€Å"prostitution violate the right to carnal and moral righteousness” and also â€Å"the right to liberty and credentials”; therefore, it should not be legalized. Admittedly, Unigwe and Hoffman seem to be on different sides of the question. However, both appoint a common ambition, which is to protect women in general.\r\nUnigue states that, â€Å"criminalizing prostitution does not irradiate it…, it gives the customers in unfair advantage”. (Chika Unigwe, nytimes,com, April 19, 2012). From her point of view, the fact that we associate prostitution with crime and wildness does not eliminate its existence. It reinforces the customers to take bring in of the situation, knowing that it is a dirty stake; ther efore they should also play dirty. For Unigwe, legalizing prostitution volition give women better advantages in this practice. Whereas Hoffman, who does not consider the advantages that would bring much(prenominal) legalization. She focuses instead in the consequences of prostitution in real life. She declares that â€Å"Prostitution violates the prohibition of thralldom , of force labor and trafficking in somebody”(catwap.wordpress.com, Cecilia Hoffman, n.d).It is clear that for Hoffman prostitution yield to a fault much negative effects on women, that should not lead to its legalization.\r\nUnigwe continues to emphasize the benefits of legalizing this old practice by asserting that it would give support to women who need help in the business. â€Å"Pimp have these illegal prostitutes in their power because the women can find no resource to help” (Chika Unigwe, nytimes,com, April 19, 2012). consort to her, the fact that women are suffering in this practice is un deniable, then, their need for help is prevailing. The truth of prostitution, for the author, will protect the right for women to be safer in their practice, to have the laws and regulations as their backup in any case of attack or violation.\r\nOn the other hand, Hoffman does not keep an eye on with this point of view; she belittles the practice of prostitution in itself. Conforming to her view point, prostitution is a set of violations of human’s right. â€Å"It violates the right to enjoy the highest standard of physical and mental health” (catwap.wordpress.com, Cecilia Hoffman, n.d). She implies the violence, diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and insecure abortion, all part of the common problems encountered in prostitution. For this reason, legalizing this practice also means legalizing diseases, vulnerable abortion and so forth,\r\nsomething that Hoffman would totally disagree upon.\r\nBesides Hoffman ideas, there are other points to denote. Unigwe would say th at the rate of disease is high among the prostitutes because many of them do not have easy introduction to health care as the legal workers. â€Å" even though some charity organization go forth health care for illegal arouse workers, many of them are reluctant and apprehension to accept the help” (Chika Unigwe, nytimes,com, april 19, 2012). The fact for these prostitutes to be illegal, cause them to resort to stay in darkness in order to survive. According to Unigwe, there is a expression to hang the rate of diseases surrounded by the prostitutes, which is by do prostitution legal. Subsequently, they will have better access to health care; there will be no fear among them of being marginalized.\r\nBoth Unigwe and Hoffman are aware(predicate) of the consequences or effects of prostitution on women in particular. This shared value- women right prevails- pretend a common ground between the two sides. Both have a common preoccupation, but they have different ways of ex pressing it. Nevertheless, this common ground does not lead them to the same conclusion. Hoffman is totally against the legality of prostitution, considering it as a humiliation or degradation of women values, reducing them to â€Å"simple commodity” to be â€Å"bought and sold”. She stands against prostitution as a practice, and considers it as an aberration that need to be eradicated in our society; if possible. However, Unigwe is more open minded on the subject, while being against the problems encountered by the prostitutes.\r\nIn line of credit with Hoffman, she proposes the benefits related to such legality, both for the women and for society. She advances that:â€Å"women who work legally have better access to health care, security measure against violent customers and protection against exploitation”( Chika Unigwe, nytimes,com, april 19, 2012). She also believes that society gains funds from such legality, precisely through income tax revenues. In he r point of view, this is a skinny approach to face the blatant phenomenon of prostitution.\r\nAs two sociological active people, Hoffman and Unigwe are obviously emphasizing the need for women to be treated fairly well. Hoffman believes that the female sex would be more protected and considered if prostitution’s rate was decreasing; thus legalizing it is out of her list. Whereas Unigwe, who consider the fact that there is actually prostitutes who are suffering in order to survive. Based on this, she thinks of the legality of prostitution as a way to help them in their cause. Although Hoffman and Unigwe view prostitution on different angles, they shared a key value that can belike lead them to a consensus in the future.\r\n fly the coop cited\r\nChika Unigwe, Legality Brings Protection and Better Care, The unsanded York Time website, april 19, 2012. Cecilia Hoffman, â€Å" Sex: From human involution to sexual labor”, CATW-AP website, n.d.\r\n'