Working with children in need

Working with baby birdren in needThis appellation volition inform the constituent of a Local Authority (LA) Social Worker (SW) when clears with tykeren in need and their families, and those in need of safeguarding and protection, pass on also inform the main role of children and families sw and reasons why they would be involved. Furthermore it go out discuss the importance of multidisciplinary on the job(p) identify different forms of detestation, their impact and alleviation. In line with evidence based practice, the Children Act 1989 atoms 17 and 47 will be analysed as intervention methodsIts important as a sw to utilise an fancying of theories of human growth and maturement to understand the various stages of emergence that the children are undergoing, before making whatsoever purpose of safeguarding. Children in need may have faced extraordinary experiences in their early lives that may locomote their physical, intellectual, emotional, sociable or behavioural development. Safeguarding is specify by (HM Government 2013) as the action we take to promote the well-being of children and protect them from malign. Child protection is defined by RCPCH, (2006) as the process of protecting individual children identified as either fetching, or likely to suffer, signifi stick outt harm as a result of ab engagement or neglect.Section 17 (10) of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) defines a child in need as a child who is unlikely to secure or maintain, or to have the opportunity of achieving or maintaining, a conjectural standard of health or development without the cookery for him/her of servings by a local authority or his/her health or development is likely to be meaning(a)ly impaired, or further impaired without the provision for him/her of such services or he/she is disabled (H M Government, 1989, section 17) gives LA duties and powers to provide services for children in need and their families Part 111 (Sec17 (1)).When a referral is made, LA is forced to construe initial enquiries within 10 days. This is to find out what is happening to a child and decide which action should be interpreted to protect the child as set in the CA1989 S47 of protective covering of Children (Brammer 2013). This guide draws on all professionals to institute together to promote childrens public assistance and ensures families are provided with much take resources.In some prehistoric children cases these processes werent upheld and lead to the death of children like Baby P and capital of Seychelles Climbie. Lord Laming ((Laming and Office, 2003)) stated that communication has played a major role in successes and failures of the system. He also made recommendations that will ignite working together in terms multi-disciplinary teams working together information share Connolly and Ward, (2008) suggested It is good practice to consider childrens rights to protection as of prevalent duty and at the same time work in compact with their p arents unless doing so would harm them.The Framework for Assessment of Children (Figure 1) in Need and their Families (DoH, 2000) emphasises the use of an ecological approach to identify the child within the environment and offers a holistic approach (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). It enables professionals to identify systems affecting a child, the most and the social forces impacting on his lifespan therefore, resulting in interventions being applied where they are needed most. An ecological approach looks at people, families, cultures, communities, policies and identifies and intervenes upon strengths and weaknesses in the transactional processes between these systems (Greene and Greene, 2008). Figure1 (Department of Health 2000, p.1) sustenance conditions may result in disturbed nights, which can lead to warp and tiredness (Hazel, 2002). Similarly, inadequate housing may cause parents anxiety and affect their capacity to care for the children. Therefore, a sw could use their powers to m ake a referral for families to acquire an adequate accommodation. According to Gill and Jack (2007) the ecological conjecture is important in the development of holistic approaches to safeguarding children. Its strengths are that it focuses on individuals as part and incorporating other systems, so it integrates social with psychological elements of practice however, it is criticised for assume that everything fits into a social place (Payne, 2009).A SW is expected to consider human rights issues when completing any assessment. In the community theres a whole variety of groups e.g. ethnic minorities, women, disabled people, homosexuals children just to celebrate a few. Professionals are required to uphold and defend the rights of individuals whilst seeking to project their needs and this are all governed by The Human Rights Act 1998. Brayne Shoot, (2010) say the act has also heavily influenced the Disability Discriminations Act, (2005) and Equality Act, (2006 2010)Welbourne (2012) said SW is a profession that engages with peoples lives at all levels, from the hardheaded to the deeply personal. Lord Laming (2003) said child protection is everyones business, and its important that SW, constabulary, and health workers take the lead role for the procedures and processes that protect children from harm.The CA 1989 sec 47(1) places a duty on LA to check out when they are informed that a child who lives or is found in their areais the subject of an emergency protection orderis in police custodyhave reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives, or is found in the area is suffering, or is likely to suffer a significant harmLA will trade an initial child protection gathering that consists of all professionals including the child, family members. This is a league aimed at setting out plans in place for both family and the group members. They will meet within 10 days after the initial conference and at least 8 weeks after that. The plan will be consid ering day to day details of the care plan and to put it into practice. afterward the case has been opened, implemented and put into practice, a Review Child protective cover Case Conference is called to survey and assess the progress of the case. The first review is held within 3 months of the initial conference and at least vi months after that. A SW will unceasingly aim to touch results and return the child to their parents.Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006 (Department of Health) has 5 acknowledgeable forms of abomination as neglect, physical, emotional, sexual and domestic abuses, and the latter has been recently added and prize in its own right. Coleen L (2003) suggested that Negligence can include behaviours that receipt, fraudulently misrepresentation, defamation of character act, violation of human rights, malicious prosecution.Maureen OLoughlin and Steve OLoughlin (2008) suggested that Parents have a central role in their childrens eudaimonia and protectio n from harm, and should therefore be included in all decisions and actions taken by professionals Parents have their complex needs as well, some abuse drugs and alcohol and generally have low self-esteem. If parents deny sw get to to a child and theres a possibility of a greater risk of life or likelihood of serious harm, LA will apply for the Child Assessment Order sec43 CA 1989 when they considering any kind of contact, LA would have reasons to suspect concerns with development, welfare and health of a child. This order will only last 8 days without extension. fate Protection Order (EPO) under S44 of the CA 1989. It can last for 8 days with the option to extend for 7 more days. Brayne Carr, (2010) suggested that It is important that any discussions with children are done in a way that minimises the distress and maximises the likelihood of them providing clear and accurate accounts The children may be looked after by the LA with parental agreement (Children Act, 1989, sec. 20. A child may only be kept in police protection however, for 72 hours (Brammer 2006). Other order available is Recovery order sec50, will be applied if a child under PPO or EPO is removed from the responsible applicant. Police can recover the child and return them to the place of safety.SW has an obligation to conduct themselves ethically, engaging in ethical decisionmaking, including partnership working with service users and this was quoted by The Code of morals for Social Work (BASW, 2011). Social work is a very privileged profession, they draw up conclusions and judgement on what they observe and hear. Hence its necessary to develop an inner acquirement not to use prejudice in any engagement. Empowerment has been silent as a paradigm within anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice (Lishman, 2007) and can be implemented through partnership working, which is a key social work value (Thompson, 2009).This assignment has shown how and why a sw would intervene when a child bec omes in need. It also discussed the LAs responsibility for children in need and their families. Aim is to protect and safeguard children from harm by forming partnership working with families assist in providing alternative services to promote their welfare. The assignment drew up on relevant legislation that ensure welfare of a child remains paramount, also challenges all professionals to collaborate in a systematic manner. Children have been let down in the past and Every Child Matters ensured it is everyones responsibility to ensure that their health and development is secured. This reiterates the importance of SWs impact into the system, drawn from Code of Ethics sws should always challenge any discrimination, recognise diversity, always distribute resources to those in need, challenge unjust policies and practices and work in solidarity. In conclusion a sw would not be aware if a child is in need or requires protection however, the facts in this demonstrate provide a sensible method of judgement on whether a child is in need or at risk of significant harm.